|
Definitions
Relevance to
converting performance
What
affects the "treatment level" of OPP
films
Test
principles
Related
Terminology
Definitions
All of the following
terms are used in the polymer films industry
to represent the relative receptivity of a
film surface to the addition of inks,
coatings, adhesives and extruded polymers.
-
Surface
energy is a solid surface
characteristic associated with the
molecular forces of its interaction with
another material. Surface energy is the
true film characteristic that we want to
measure, but it can't be measured
directly. So, we deduce this property by
measuring one of two substitute
properties: wetting tension or contact
angle. Both of these measurements involve
observing the behavior of liquids placed
on the film's surface.
-
Surface
tension is the force that exists
between a liquid and the atmosphere it is
in. For example, in atmospheric air, a
drop of water will bead up on some solid
surfaces. It is the surface tension
existing between the water and the air
that allows this to occur. The drop of
water can spread, or wet-out, on another
solid surface if the new surface has
molecular forces (surface energy) high
enough to overcome the water/air surface
tension and draw the water flat onto it.
-
Wetting
tension is the maximum liquid
surface tension that will spread, rather
than bead up, on the film surface. It is a
measurable property that estimates a
film's surface energy. ASTM D 2578 is a
procedure for determining wetting tension
by applying different test solutions of
increasing surface tensions until one is
found that just spreads (wets) the film
surface. Units are dynes/cm.
-
Treatment
level refers to "how
much" or "how well" the
polymer film surface was treated in the
film-making process. It is most commonly
quantified with a wetting tension value in
units of dynes/cm. Therefore, you will
also hear it called "dyne
level."
NOTE: |
Treatment
level, dyne level, surface energy,
surface tension, and wetting tension
are all terms frequently used
interchangeably. As you can see from
the definitions, this is not precisely
correct. Wetting tension, which is the
term ASTM uses, is the correct term to
describe the value determined by the
test solutions procedure.
|
-
Contact
angle is a measurement of the
behavior of pure water in contact with the
film surface. (Other liquids of known
surface tension could be used, but water
is most commonly used.) The ASTM D 5946
procedure requires a precise volume
droplet of pure water be placed on the
film surface. The surface energy of the
film controls whether the droplet tends to
stand up or flatten out. This is
quantified by measuring the contact angle
of the droplet with the surface. A higher
energy ("higher treatment") film
will cause the droplet to be flatter and
closer to the surface, which results in a
smaller contact angle value (8). Units are
degrees, or the result can be reported as
(unitless) cosine 8. ExxonMobil uses a
dynamic contact angle (DCA) tester to
evaluate the same property. Our test is
substantially different than the ASTM
standard and may not produce comparable
results.
back
to top
Relevance to
converting performance
The surface energy of
a film is critical to achieving good wet-out
and adhesion of inks, coatings, and adhesives.
The film's surface energy must be higher than
the surface tension of the solution being laid
down in order to get good wetting. The
molecular forces that allow good wetting also
contribute to adhesion. Water-based systems
have higher surface tensions than
solvent-based systems and, therefore, require
a higher minimum level of film surface energy
to perform well.
| Film |
Wetting
Tension
(dynes/cm) |
| Polytetrafluoroethylene
(PTFE, Teflon®) |
19 |
| Polypropylene
(PP) |
29 |
| Polyethylene
(PE) |
31 |
| Polyester
(PET) |
43 |
Table 13:
Wetting tensions (as an estimate of surface
energy) of common untreated polymer surfaces
In extrusion
lamination or extrusion coating processes, a
molten extrudate (not a liquid solution) is
being applied to the film surface. Wet-out is
not an issue, but an adequate surface energy
is required for good bond strengths.
Some polymer films,
most prominently, polyethylene and
polypropylene, have inherently low surface
energies, and these surfaces need to be
modified to be "converter-processable."
The easiest and most common modification is
called "treatment" ExxonMobil uses
two in-line treatment processes to increase
the energy, polarity, and processability of
film surfaces.
-
Corona
treatment involves exposing a
moving film surface to a plasma discharge
created in the air gap between a grounded
electrode and a high-voltage electrode.
The plasma is purple glowing ionized air
that reacts chemically with the film
surface. Oxidation reactions occur, which
add polar functional groups and increase
surface energy.
-
Flame
treatment exposes a moving film
surface to a gas-fired flame at a high
enough temperature to create a plasma of
free oxygen and nitrogen atoms, electrons,
and ions. The plasma reacts chemically
with the film surface, which adds polar
functional groups and increases surface
energy.
Depending on the
product design, a treated OPP film will have a
wetting tension between 35 and 55 dynes/cm.
This whole range of values works well in most
flexpack converting applications. Challenging
situations, like some water-based
applications, may require films in the higher
end of the range. For example, the treated
high-energy surfaces of LBW and CSR-2 with
wetting tensions of 50 to 55 dynes/cm provide
exceptional wet-out and adhesion in
challenging applications.
back
to top
What
affects the "treatment level" of OPP
films
For many reasons,
treatment level can be a controversial and
complicated topic. Treatment level really
refers to the surface energy of a treated
film, which can only be estimated by tests
that quantify the behavior of specific liquids
on the surface. The following is a list of the
primary factors affecting treatment
level.
-
Measurement:
The method of using dyne solutions to
measure wetting tension is notoriously
prone to a high variation of results. A
few years ago, the Flexible Packaging
Association (FPA) performed a round-robin
evaluation and found that wetting tension
measurements of identical materials, made
in different laboratories, varied as much
as 11 to 15 dynes/cm. Many factors
contribute to this high variation.
Bottom-line, the wetting tension test is
an unreliable predictor of performance.
Therefore, ExxonMobil has invested in
contact angle testers, which provide more
reliable data.
-
Time: The
effect of treatment can decay with time.
Very old films may not convert well, but
ExxonMobil films are designed to have a
good performance shelf-life of one year.
-
Treatment
process: Many factors like
voltage, residence time, and temperature
affect the degree of surface energy
modification.
-
Polymer
reactivity: Polymers vary in their
reactivity to corona or flame treatment.
With a more reactive polymer, it is easier
to achieve the chemical changes that
increase surface energy. Polypropylene is
more challenging to treat than many other
materials.
-
Additives:
Most resins need one or more additives to
produce films with maximized performance
in a particular application. Slip and
anti-static additives, in particular, can
either cause artificially high or low
wetting tension values, or interfere with
wet-out and adhesion in the converting
process.
CAUTION: |
Treatment
pens or dyne pens are available from
several manufacturers. They are magic
marker-type pens that contain liquid
rated at a certain surface tension.
The pen tip is swiped onto a film
surface, and if the liquid does not
bead up, then surface is said to be
treated to a dyne/cm-Ievel equal to or
greater than that pen rating. If it
does bead up, then the treatment level
is said to be less than the pen
rating. THESE RESULTS DO NOT
CORRELATE WELL WITH STANDARD TEST
PROCEDURE VALUES. Pen solutions
can be contaminated with each film
swipe. It is appropriate to use
treatment pens to distinguish a
treated surface from an untreated
surface, but not to assign a specific
wetting tension value.
|
back
to top
Test principles
There are two tests
used to estimate the surface energy of a film:
wetting tension and contact angle. Each has
its advantages and disadvantages, which are
described in Table 14. For over five years,
ExxonMobil has been expanding its use of the
contact angle test as a process control
measurement. Because of the improved data
quality, ExxonMobil will continue to do so.
ExxonMobil procedure
#417 uses a Cahn Model DCA-312 or DCA-315 to
measure dynamic contact angle (DCA). Unlike
the ASTM contact angle test that applies a
single water droplet, our Cahn test immerses a
prepared film sample into a beaker of
distilled water at a constant rate of speed,
while a sensitive balance records the wetting
force. The Cahn DCA software contains well
established theoretical calculations, which
convert this measurement into advancing and
receding contact angle values. ExxonMobil has
standardized on recording the cosine of the
receding contact angle value.
| Test
Attributes |
Wetting
Tension
(Dyne Solutions) |
Contact
Angle |
| Test
results variation |
Poor |
Excellent |
| Cost
of test equipment |
Low |
High |
| Speed
and simplicity |
Very
good |
Moderate |
Table
14: Comparison of basic test attributes
A more common, but less reliable, test is
wetting tension, as described in ASTM D 2578.
This method uses standard wetting tension
solutions consisting of varying ratios of
formamide in cellosolve to create different
surface tensions. A test solution is selected
that is rated less than the anticipated film
value. Using a new cotton-tipped applicator,
the solution is applied in a zigzag pattern
over about one square inch of film. If the
applied solution holds together for more than
two seconds, rather than breaking up into
droplets, then the test is repeated with the
next higher surface tension solution. If the
solution holds together for less than two
seconds, the test is repeated with a lower
surface tension solution. This scenario is
reiterated until you can determine the
solution that comes nearest to wetting the
film surface for exactly two seconds. This is
the film's wetting tension. A new cotton
applicator must be used each time to prevent
contamination of the solutions. A new section
of film must be tested with each iteration.
back
to top
Related terminology
Dyne
test |
Dyne test is a commonly
used name for the wetting tension test,
because it uses solutions that are rated
at different dynes/cm. |
Wet-out |
Wet-out is the spreading
of a liquid on a film, rather that its
beading up. It is important that inks,
coatings, and adhesives wet-out, or
spread, on a film's surface for proper
appearance and adhesion. |
back
to top
|